Ø Russia’s decision to export is highly capable
Su-35 planes is expected to bolter China’s military presence in the South China
Sea. It is also set to escalate military technology exchanges that would help
Beijing and Moscow develop cutting edge weapons. After protracted negotiations
that lasted several years, Russia, finally relented to sell China, 24 Su-35
planes. In doing so Moscow overrode apprehensions that its panache for “reverse
engineering” Russian weapons, could hasten Beijing’s rise as a formidable
competitor to Russia, in the global arms market. The 2 billion dollar deal
means that transfer of technology, which Beijing badly requires to develop the
next generation of weapons, is part of the contract. Analysts say that
geopolitics has played a major part in cementing the deal. Both Russia and
China are now strategically well aligned. Russia saw the toppling of an elected
government Ukraine, as an attempt by the Atlantic Alliance to dislodge it from
Sevastopol, the headquarters of its Black Sea fleet in Crimea. The Chinese are
also wary of Washington’s growing presence in the western Pacific, following
the “Asia Pivot” doctrine of the Obama administration. Washington’s
doctrinal shift would bolster the Pacific command, which would accumulate
nearly 60 per cent of all US forces under the wings. Russian media reports have
concluded that growing tensions between China and the US over the South China
Sea clinched the S-35 deal, whose negotiations had commenced in 2008. The
Chinese felt the urgency of these planes as battle readiness of its homegrown
J-20 and J-31 stealth fighters — the eventual replacements for the Su-35 — was
still a few years away. China will benefit from the purchase of the
Russian jets in three ways. First, the acquisition of 24 Su-35 planes would
greatly extend China’s reach over the South China Sea. Su-35 planes, capable of
taking off from short runways, will cover a large footprint if deployed from
China’s newly developed artificial islands in the South China Sea. Second, the
Russian jets can effectively counter the U.S. F-35 stealth fighters. The
Irbis-6 radars on the Su-35 can track the state-of-the art American jets nearly
90 kilometres away. Finally, China can acquire valuable radar and engine
technology by inducting the Russian jets. This would plug a major gap in
China’s drive for developing homegrown planes. Mil.huanqiu.com, China’s
official military forum acknowledges Beijing's interest in the engine and radar
of the SU-35. Despite China’s best efforts, China’s self-developed WS-15
engines, meant to power the J-20 stealth fighters have so far fallen short of
expectations. Besides, absorption of Russian engine technology could also help
improve the power units of the J-series aircraft, including the J-11D and the
J-16. Both these planes, following extensive reverse engineering and
development, have been derived from the basic Su-27 fighter jets that China had
bought from Russia in 1996. The Su-35 deal has also benefited Russia
significantly. Cash strapped Russia has acquired badly needed funds, which
could help alleviate mounting expenses both at home and abroad. Moscow has
already profited from the financial transfers resulting from its previous
decision to export its advanced S-400 air defence missile systems to China.
Chinese media reports suggest that Beijing is now keen on acquiring technology
used in Russia’s Lada class submarines. Observers say that with tensions
with Washington escalating, the Russians have narrowed down their interest on
acquiring know-how used in hypersonic glide vehicles that are being developed
by China. Last year, the Chinese Defence Ministry confirmed that Wu-14, hypersonic
glide vehicle had been tested. The Russian news agency RIA-Novosti had revealed
that the WU-14, launched by an intercontinental ballistic missile, separated
from the missile in the upper atmosphere. It then glided and dived towards the
earth at a speed that may be 10 times that of the velocity of sound, reaching
around 12,800 km an hour — good enough to breach existing anti-missile defences.
No comments:
Post a Comment